Archive for the ‘Election Reform’ Category

Book Review: Corporate Takeover of America

Thursday, May 10th, 2012

Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer — And Turned Its Back on the Middle Class by Jacob S. Hacker & Paul Pierson

As Will Rogers famously said, “I am not a member of any organized party — I am a Democrat.”

Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson detail how the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers organized business interests to block progressive legislation in the 70s. This involved both the long affinity between corporate America and the Republican Party and intensive lobbying efforts to dissuade moderate Democrats from voting for progressive legislation in the Senate during the Carter administration.

The first part of the book outlines the contrast between the American economic and political scene after World War II and the 70s with the scene in the past 30 years. Most of this material repeats what has been shown in study after study. The authors counter the usual explanations of the change in a CSI detective style, showing that such things as education and technology do not explain the concentration of power and wealth that has occurred.

What has happened, according to Hacker and Paul Pierson  is the strengthen organization of corporate America led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers and the weakening of organizations which represented a broad spectrum of middle America. The authors describe how the Chamber of Commerce and National Association of Manufacturers successfully lobbied to block labor laws and business regulations during the Carter administration when progressives thought that a Democratic President, Senate and House would enhance regulation of environment and work and product safety as well as eliminate impediments to labor organizations. They also describe how corporate America has transformed the Democratic Party from a pro-working class party to a pro-business party, albeit perhaps not quite as pro-business as the Republicans.

Part of the reason for corporate success in Washington is attributed to the decline in participation in labor unions and a variety of middle American organizations including the Veterans of Foreign Wars and service clubs such as Lions, Shriners and Rotary clubs all of which did provide middle America with a more unified voice in the 1940-60s.

The authors also detail the fact that, at least in the late 1970s it wasn’t necessary for the corporate interests to enact new “business-friendly” legislation or to repeal older legislation; all that was necessary was to block passage of progressive legislation. We have seen this strategy repeated both during the Clinton administration which was unable to get health care reform passed. Doing nothing was all that the health care segments required. We have also seen it in 2009 — the Republicans do not need to pass anything for corporate America. All they have to do — and they have been very successful in this — is to block progressive legislation either by threat of filibuster in the Senate, or in committee, or in the 112th Congress the House. And, in either case, we have minority rule.

Hacker and Pierson do not go into great detail about the role of corporate America money in political campaigns. For that side of the story you should read Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress — and a Plan to Stop It by Lawrence Lessig.

The authors conclude the book with a conclusion “Beating Winner-Take-All” which I must confess is rather disappointing. Having identified the problem as being the effective political organization of corporate America to oppose progressive legislation and even to roll back progressive laws, Hacker and Pierson focus more on the difficulties of getting the tens of millions of middle Americans organized to oppose the corporate takeover of the political system of America. The opposition will require that middle Americans once again organize themselves to speak in Washington — and I might add in their state capitals.

I recommend this book for those who want to have a better understanding of the American political scene today.

Resolution Concerning Congressional and Legislative Redistricting

Wednesday, February 29th, 2012

A Draft

Whereas the Texas Legislature has been unable to draw districts for Congress and the Legislature in every year following the decennial census since 1971 that met the standards of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution guaranteeing persons the equal protection of the laws;

Whereas the gerrymanders in 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001 and 2011 have abridged the voting privileges of Texas citizens, making the votes of some citizens count for more than others in the legislature;

Whereas Republican Texas Senator Jeff Wentworth of San Antonio has repeatedly introduced bill which would create a bipartisan redistricting commission which would be independent of the pressures of congressmen and legislators;

Whereas Democratic Texas Representative José Rodriguez of El Paso has introduced legislation which would set state standards by which redistricting must comply; and

Whereas the failed efforts to create legal congressional and legislative districts has resulted in expensive law suits and special sessions of the legislature which Texas cannot afford;

Be it resolved that the Texas Democratic Party endorse Senator Wentworth’s proposal to create a redistricting commission consisting of equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats who would select an additional member as its chair, none of whom could be elected officials or party officers, that would be charged with drawing districts for congressional and legislative districts;

Be it resolved that the Texas Democratic Party endorse Representative Rodriquez’ proposal to create specific standards that district maps must meet that would

  • Keep voters together who share common interests such as economic, geographic and racial interests,
  • Keep districts compact so they don’t snake through and around cities, suburbs and towns, and
  • Keep partisan political considerations from determining how districts are drawn, including prohibiting the use of neighborhood voting history; and

Be it resolved that candidates for the Texas legislature be urged to support and campaign on these reforms.

Resolution Concerning Corporate “Personhood”

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

A Draft 

Whereas the United States of America ratified the Fourteenth Amendment of its Constitution guaranteeing every person life, liberty and property; due process of law; and the equal protection of the laws;

Whereas it was clearly the intent of the Congress and Legislatures of the several states to protect actual persons rather than legal fictions;

Whereas the Supreme Court of the United State has misrepresented this amendment in Santa Clara v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 118 U.S. 394 (1886), by holding that the legal fiction of corporations are persons under the Fourteenth Amendment;

Whereas corporations are legal fictions created by law and granted privileges and immunities not available to citizens and persons in the United States;

Whereas a long line of Supreme Court rulings for over a century have been based upon this misinterpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment;

Whereas in the recent Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 08-205 (2010) decision, the Court granted to corporations unprecedented First Amendment rights;

Whereas the consequence of Citizens United as resulted in hundreds of millions of corporate dollars into the political process, greatly impairing the voice of citizens and persons in the political process; and

Whereas Citizens United has denied citizens and persons the equal protection of the laws;

Be It Resolved that the Texas Democratic Party adopt a platform that includes a call for an Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America defining “person” as an actual, individual, living human being;

Be It Resolved that the Texas Democratic Party urge the National Democratic Party to adopt an Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America defining “person” as an actual, individual, living human being;

Be It Resolved that the Texas Democratic Party urge all candidates for the United States Congress and the Texas Legislature to support and to work actively for such an Amendment; and

Be It Resolved that the Texas Democratic Party and the National Democratic Party campaign and actively work to outlaw corporate funding of election campaigns and to enact legislation ending the existence of so-called “Super PACs.